<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Handle Prohibited Interview Questions (Part 3)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://findjobstoday.net/job-interview-tips/how-to-handle-prohibited-interview-questions-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://findjobstoday.net/job-interview-tips/how-to-handle-prohibited-interview-questions-part-3/</link>
	<description>Helping you find a job today!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: employment discrimination concerning weight</title>
		<link>http://findjobstoday.net/job-interview-tips/how-to-handle-prohibited-interview-questions-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>employment discrimination concerning weight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://findjobstoday.net/job-interview-tips/how-to-handle-prohibited-interview-questions-part-3/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>This week the Oregon Court of Appeals reversed the trial court&#039;s finding of unconscionability and upheld a mandatory arbitration clause in an employment contract, sending an employee&#039;s discrimination and other claims to an arbitrator instead of a jury. Upon initial employment with the defendant, plaintiff signed an agreement to arbitrate all disputes rather than file suit in civil court. Both federal and Oregon law favor arbitration, but the enforceability of any arbitration agreement in Oregon is governed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the Oregon Court of Appeals reversed the trial court&#8217;s finding of unconscionability and upheld a mandatory arbitration clause in an employment contract, sending an employee&#8217;s discrimination and other claims to an arbitrator instead of a jury. Upon initial employment with the defendant, plaintiff signed an agreement to arbitrate all disputes rather than file suit in civil court. Both federal and Oregon law favor arbitration, but the enforceability of any arbitration agreement in Oregon is governed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

